MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2304143866 · doi:10.1149/ma2014-04/4/651

A Solid-State Single-Ion Conductor for Lithium Batteries Based on Anionic Nanoparticles of Fluorinated Titania

2014· article· en· W2304143866 on OpenAlexaff
Vito Di Noto, Federico Bertasi, Enrico Negro, Keti Vezzù, Steve Greenbaum, Fabio Bassetto, Stefano Zeggio

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Canadian institutionsCape Breton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrolyteMaterials scienceLithium (medication)AnataseAnodeElectrochemistryChemical engineeringSurface modificationNanoparticleNanotechnologyChemistryElectrodePhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nowadays, among the most challenging classes of materials for the development of high-energy density lithium batteries are electrolytes and high-capacity cathode materials [1]. A considerable interest is attracted by metallic lithium anode-based Li-S and Li-air batteries because of their high specific capacity [2]. Nevertheless, the use of a metallic lithium anode compromises the chemical and electrochemical stability of the electrolyte. To address these drawbacks, a significant research effort is recently devoted to the design and preparation of new lithium-conducting electrolytes. Here, a new concept of electrolyte based on a solid-state lithium single-ion conductor is proposed, which opens new perspectives in the development of advanced lithium batteries [3]. The electrolyte is obtained by direct reaction of nanometric fluorinated TiO2 (FT) with molten metallic lithium, and consists of nanoparticles (NPs) with surface anionic groups neutralized by lithium cations. The resulting nanopowder is labelled LiFT® [4]. It should be highlighted that after functionalization, the conductivity of fluorinated TiO2 increases by more than four orders of magnitude. In this work, the structure of LiFT is elucidated by means of several techniques such as: Inductively-Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy (ICP-AES); High-Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy (HR-TEM), powder X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-MIR and -FIR), electrochemical measurements and solid-state Magic-Angle Spinning-NMR (MAS-NMR) spectroscopy. XRD and HR-TEM measurements show that LiFT has the “core” structure of anatase, with Li cations present only in the external lithium-rich shell of NPs. Thus, no intercalation processes of Li+ in “core” LiFT NPs take place. In addition, it is demonstrated that lithium cations can migrate through grain boundaries of electrolyte NPs in a very effective way, achieving: 1) a room-temperature single-ion conductivity of about 3x10-4 Scm-1; 2) an excellent electrochemical stability; and 3) a high exchange current density. All these features, together with an easy synthesis process, which is based on precursors obtained from very cheap starting materials, make LiFT a very attractive material for application in several fields such as: a) all-solid-state lithium batteries; b) molten electrode lithium batteries; c) nanocomposite electrolytes and d) lithium-air batteries. [1] M. Armand, J.-M. Tarascon, Building better batteries, Nature. 451 (2008) 652–657. [2] P.G. Bruce, S.A. Freunberger, L.J. Hardwick, J.-M. Tarascon, Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage., Nat. Mater. 11 (2012) 19–29. [3] F. Bertasi, K. Vezzù, E. Negro, S. Greenbaum, V. Di Noto, Single-ion-conducting nanocomposite polymer electrolytes based on PEG400 and anionic nanoparticles: Part 1. Synthesis, structure and properties, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. (2013). [4] V. Di Noto, F. Bertasi, E. Negro, M. Piga, M. Bettiol, F. Bassetto, Solid-state electrolytes based on fluorine-doped oxides, PCT/IB2012/053542, 2013.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicAdvanced Battery Materials and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207