MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2304147917 · doi:10.4043/26505-ms

Deep Sea Laser Raman – Past, Present and Future Developments for In Situ Chemical Analysis and Applications

2016· article· en· W2304147917 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOffshore Technology Conference Asia · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Ocean Sciences
KeywordsSubseaMethaneRaman spectroscopyIn situDeep seaEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceMaterials scienceNanotechnologyProcess engineeringGeologyOceanographyChemistryEngineeringOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Deep Ocean Raman In Situ Spectrometers (DORISS instruments) where developed at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute (MBARI) for the purposes of identifying compounds and studying in situ chemical reactions in a non-destructive manner while working with solids, liquids and gases. The approach taken began with modification of a standard bench top lab unit for use at sea to demonstrate feasibility. The second generation then solved several impediments to improved performance in the deep sea as well as development of additional tools to enhance capabilities. The third generation is now past the design process and in assembly for bench top testing to bring the fluorescence signal (noise) down to achieve a 19 fold increase in sensitivity. This allows the use of Raman on compounds that have high order organic compounds such as some oils and makes the detection of CO2 much easier. The high power approach in this system will enable faster operations for subsea mining. The first instrument (DORISS I) was greatly successful and perform science experiments from Canadian waters to the Gulf of California looking at hydrates as well as higher order compounds, gas vents, phase boundaries and the ice cage structures entrapping methane as well as other gases. DORISS I was able to determine thermogenic versus biogenic methane for example. DORISS II increased sensitivity and performance by reducing the pressure effects on the optical system. Precision pointing devices were incorporated to look below the surface of some compounds as well as vertical and horizontal scanning of in situ chemical processes. A pore water probe was developed which allowed for very precise vertical profiling of sediments showing to properly access the methane content in the ocean bottom sediments which in general is greatly underestimated using tube cores and other sampling methods with shipboard analysis. The next generation DORISS, currently in development, promises to give gains in sensitivity as well as the ability to obtain Raman signatures from volatile compounds which would normally be unclassified due to fluorescence. The application of Raman has revolutionized the medical industry and promises to do the same for oil & gas as well as subsea mining. With the trends in land based Raman spectrometers toward lower costs it can be argued that these techniques enable industry to employ a new tool and manage ocean resources more wisely.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.331
Threshold uncertainty score0.461

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it