MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2304380172 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2010-0008

OPTIMAL DESIGN OF DAMPED DYNAMIC VIBRATION ABSORBER FOR DAMPED PRIMARY SYSTEMS

2010· article· en· W2304380172 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration Control and Rheological Fluids
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDynamic Vibration AbsorberChebyshev filterControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemVibrationSet (abstract data type)DamperTuned mass damperMathematicsApplied mathematicsComputer scienceMathematical analysisPhysicsStructural engineeringEngineeringAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study focuses on the optimum design of the damped dynamic vibration absorber (DVA) for damped primary systems. Different from the conventional way, the DVA damper is connected between the absorber mass and the ground. Two numerical approaches are employed. The first approach solves a set of nonlinear equations established by the Chebyshev’s equioscillation theorem. The second approach minimizes a compound objective subject to a set of the constraints. First the two methods are applied to classical systems and the results are compared with those from the analytical solutions. Then the modified Chebyshev’s equioscillation theorem method is applied to find the optimum damped DVAs for the damped primary system. Various results are obtained and analyzed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.926
Threshold uncertainty score0.486

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it