MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2304380172 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2010-0008

OPTIMAL DESIGN OF DAMPED DYNAMIC VIBRATION ABSORBER FOR DAMPED PRIMARY SYSTEMS

2010· article· en· W2304380172 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Kefu Liu, Gianmarc Coppola

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration Control and Rheological Fluids
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDynamic Vibration AbsorberChebyshev filterControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemVibrationSet (abstract data type)DamperTuned mass damperMathematicsApplied mathematicsComputer scienceMathematical analysisPhysicsStructural engineeringEngineeringAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study focuses on the optimum design of the damped dynamic vibration absorber (DVA) for damped primary systems. Different from the conventional way, the DVA damper is connected between the absorber mass and the ground. Two numerical approaches are employed. The first approach solves a set of nonlinear equations established by the Chebyshev’s equioscillation theorem. The second approach minimizes a compound objective subject to a set of the constraints. First the two methods are applied to classical systems and the results are compared with those from the analytical solutions. Then the modified Chebyshev’s equioscillation theorem method is applied to find the optimum damped DVAs for the damped primary system. Various results are obtained and analyzed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicVibration Control and Rheological FluidsFrench-language works237,207