MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2304507938 · doi:10.1101/042705

Functional metagenomics using <i>Pseudomonas putida</i> expands the known diversity of polyhydroxyalkanoate synthases and enables the production of novel polyhydroxyalkanoate copolymers

2016· preprint· en· W2304507938 on OpenAlexafffund
Jiujun Cheng, Trevor C. Charles

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2016
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
Topicbiodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGenome Canada
KeywordsPolyhydroxyalkanoatesPseudomonas putidaMetagenomicsPseudomonasDiversity (politics)BiologyBacteriaBiochemistryGeneticsSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Bacterially produced biodegradable polyhydroxyalkanoates with versatile properties can be achieved using different PHA synthase enzymes. This work aims to expand the diversity of known PHA synthases via functional metagenomics, and demonstrates the use of these novel enzymes in PHA production. Complementation of a PHA synthesis deficient Pseudomonas putida strain with a soil metagenomic cosmid library retrieved 27 clones expressing either Class I, Class II or unclassified PHA synthases, and many did not have close sequence matches to known PHA synthases. The composition of PHA produced by these clones was dependent on both the supplied growth substrates and the nature of the PHA synthase, with various combinations of SCL-and MCL-PHA. These data demonstrate the ability to isolate diverse genes for PHA synthesis by functional metagenomics, and their use for the production of a variety of PHA polymer and copolymer mixtures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicbiodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesFrench-language works237,207