MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Rivaroxaban Versus Enoxaparin For Prevention Of Venous Thromboembolism In Elective Total Hip Replacement: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2013· article· en· W2304579011 on OpenAlexaffabout
Stephanie Young, Jason Kielly, Maria Mathews, Andrew Furey, Kuljit Grewal, Lisa Bishop, Carla Dillon, Tiffany Lee, John Hawboldt, Laurie Twells

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsSt. John’s Health Sciences CentreMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRivaroxabanMedicineLow molecular weight heparinRetrospective cohort studyVenous thromboembolismCohortCohort studySurgeryAnesthesiaThrombosisInternal medicineWarfarinAtrial fibrillation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Rivaroxaban, an oral anti-Xa inhibitor, was approved in 2008 in Canada for prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) post elective total hip replacement (THR). Studies completed in elective THR patients showed superiority or noninferiority of rivaroxaban over injectable low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for prevention of VTE, with no difference in trial defined major bleeding. Many centres use rivaroxaban for VTE prevention post THR as standard of care. Our centre introduced rivaroxaban for THR patients in May 2009. As there is limited data on real world experience with this agent, beyond bleeding and VTE events, we evaluated the change in VTE prophylaxis for this indication. Methods A retrospective cohort study was completed comparing the change in use of a LMWH, enoxaparin, to rivaroxaban for VTE prophylaxis for elective THR patients ≥ 19 years not requiring therapeutic anticoagulation. The setting was a regional health authority servicing a population of 290 000, and the timeframe was 18 months before and 18 months after the introduction of rivaroxaban, allowing a 3 month period in between for incorporation of rivaroxaban into routine care. Patients with THR completed pre introduction of rivaroxaban were in the enoxaparin (E) group and patients with THR completed post introduction were in either the enoxaparin and rivaroxaban (E+R, given sequentially) group, or the rivaroxaban (R) group. Data were abstracted from computerized and paper records using a standardized form. Data collected included demographics, medical and medication history, risk factors for bleeding and VTE, type of anesthesia, VTE prophylaxis details, post-discharge community health (CH) nursing visits and hospital visits (emergency room (ER) and inpatient admissions), and major bleeding or VTE events. Hospital visits and VTE were assessed up to 30 days, and major bleeding up to 2 days, after the last presumed dose of medication. Primary outcomes were differences between E, E+R, and R in hospital visits, as well as referrals to, and reasons for, post discharge CH nursing visits. Results There were 246 THR procedures in E, 43 in E+R, and 190 in R. Baseline characteristics were similar between the three groups. For E, E+R, R, 52%, 49% and 53% were female with a mean age of 64, 62, 64 years and a mean BMI of 31, 32, 31 kg/m2. There was no difference in surgery duration (mean 92, 97, 91 min for E, E+R, R), or number of patients transfused (19, 16, 14% for E, E+R, R). More patients (74%) in E+R received regional anesthesia exclusively, compared to E (57%) and R (52%), p=0.01. There was no difference in post-surgery time to VTE prophylaxis initiation (mean of 22, 22, 23 hours for E, E+R, R). There was a difference in the length of stay (mean 7.1, 8.4, 6.3 days for E, E+R, R, p=0.005), as well as total duration of prophylaxis (mean 10.4, 16.1, 14.5 days for E, E+R, R, p<0.0001). Patients in the E+R sequentially received a mean of 1.7 days of enoxaparin, then 14.2 days of rivaroxaban. Post discharge, there was no difference in the number of patients with at least one ER visit (7.3, 9.3, 6.3% for E, E+R, R, p=0.775) or hospital admission (3.3, 9.3, 2.6%, p=0.096). Most patients had a referral for CH nursing visits (94, 91, 95% for E, E+R, R, p=0.253). Most referrals requested dressing changes (81, 77, 82% for E, E+R, R, p=0.720) and removal of staples (91, 96, 91%, for E, E+R, R, p=0.671). The mean number of days post discharge for staple removal was 4.1, 4.3, 5.1 days for E, E+R, R, p<0.0001. The most common frequency of dressing changes requested was every 2 days (74, 63, 60% for E, E+R, R, p=0.009). Medication administration was requested for patients in E only (84, 0, 0% for E, E+R, R, p<0.0001), with a frequency of once daily (98%). Symptomatic VTE occurred in 1.6, 2.3, and 2.1% of patients for E, E+R, and R. There were 5 major bleeding events in E (2 extra-surgical site bleeds, 3 unexpected surgical site bleeds), and 0 events in both E+R and R. Conclusion This study provides useful data, beyond VTE and bleeding events, on the impact of a change in VTE prophylaxis post elective THR. No statistically significant difference was observed in post discharge hospital visits. Most patients had post discharge CH nursing visits requested; the overall requested visit frequency was reduced for all patients receiving rivaroxaban. Differences in type of anesthesia, length of stay, and duration of prophylaxis were noted for E+R. Differences between this group and R should be further explored. Disclosures: Grewal: Bayer: Honoraria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management→French-language works237,207→