MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2304689588 · doi:10.1149/ma2016-03/1/41

Hybrid Ion Conductor: Polysulfide Exclusion for Advanced Lithium Sulfur Batteries

2016· article· en· W2304689588 on OpenAlexaff
Hee-Tak Kim, Jin Hong Lee, Hyungjun Noh

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolysulfideAnodeBattery (electricity)ElectrolyteEnergy storageCathodeLithium (medication)ElectrodeMaterials scienceChemistryPower (physics)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Today’s lithium ion batteries, which have more than twice energy of those first released 25 years ago, power most of mobile electronic devices. However, their energy density is not high enough to provide electric vehicles and drones with mobility freedom. To make electric vehicles and drones more affordable, one needs batteries that can offer a longer cruise range with a lower cost. In this regard, lithium–sulfur (Li–S) battery is now considered a promising candidate to succeed lithium-ion batteries owing to its high theoretical energy density of 2500 Wh∙kg-1, non-toxic nature, low cost, and natural abundance. Despite such promises, the commercialization of Li–S batteries has yet to succeed even after sustained effort spanning several decades. Significant problems encountered have included low sulfur utilization, short cycle life, low cycling efficiency, and high self-discharge rate. These are mainly attributed to a process known as the polysulfide (PS) shuttle; PS chains dissolved in the electrolyte diffuse to the Li anode where they directly react with the Li metal to produce lower order PS species, which diffuse back to the sulfur cathode to regenerate higher PS forms. The PS shuttle leads to incomplete charging of the sulfur electrode, corrosion of the Li electrode, and formation of electrochemically inactive lithium sulfates (LixSOy) on the sulfur electrode, thus resulting in poor battery performance. Prevention of the PS shuttle is therefore extremely important for the practical use of Li–S batteries. In this talk, we present a single ion conductor which effectively rejects PS when used as an electrolyte medium for lithium sulfur battery and demonstrate a quasi-solid state lithium sulfur battery employing it. The ion conductor features a perfluorinated lithium sulfonate polymer swollen with organic polar solvents. For the ion conduction, Li+ is the sole charge carrier, because the SO3 - groups attached to the polymer chain are immobilized and the ion conductor does not include any bi-ionic lithium salt. The solvents selected from an intensive screening process dissociate polymeric lithium salts and form a 5~6 nm-sized Li+ conducting channels. As a result, the ion conductivity of the ion conductor is as high as 10-4 S cm-1 in its quasi-solid state. To our interest, the PS solubility of the hybrid ion conductor is quite low although the solvents have high PS solubility. This behavior originates from Donnan exclusion principle; the fixed negative charges decrease the Donnan potential of the conductor, with lowering its equilibrium PS concentration. Such Donnan exclusion effect is more intensified in the absence of bi-ionic lithium salt, therefore, to strengthen PS rejection function, the hybrid ion conductor is designed without any lithium salts. The sulfur battery based on the hybrid ion conductor has highly interesting features. The composite sulfur cathode comprising of sulfur/carbon composite and the hybrid ion conductor effectively confines PS in the vicinity of the carbon matrix owing to the nearby PS-rejecting hybrid ion conductors. Moreover, the polymer electrolyte membrane between the sulfur cathode and lithium further blocks PS passage. Owing to its quasi-solid state nature, the hybrid ion conductor allows the design of bipolar stack-type lithium sulfur battery. Because the electrolyte phases of each cell are spatially separated in bipolar configuration, shunt current, which is unavoidable for liquid electrolyte based batteries, can be eliminated. The electrochemical characteristics and performances of the quasi-solid state lithium sulfur battery are presented and the underlying physics is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicAdvanced Battery Materials and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207