MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2304962890 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofu052.366

658Assessment of Knowledge, Awareness, and Attitudes Towards Pertussis and Pertussis Immunization Strategies in Post-Partum Mothers

2014· article· en· W2304962890 on OpenAlexaffabout
Matias Wengiel, Sergio Fanella

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBacterial Infections and Vaccines
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTetanusImmunizationPregnancyDiphtheriaWhooping coughFamily medicineIncidence (geometry)PediatricsPublic healthVaccinationNursingImmunologyAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. Given increases in the incidence of pertussis, protective strategies for young infants are used (cocooning, maternal immunization), but there is limited data regarding two key areas for implementation - knowledge of pertussis in pregnant women, and their willingness to participate in various preventative campaigns. With increasing rates of pertussis in Manitoba and anticipating future public health needs should Manitoba move toward a maternal immunization strategy, we surveyed post-partum women on their knowledge and beliefs of infant pertussis and prevention strategies. Methods. Women were interviewed at the two obstetrical centers in Winnipeg. A survey was developed using the Health Belief Model, assessing knowledge level about pertussis, beliefs and attitudes towards pertussis immunizations, and willingness to participate in two protective strategies (third-trimester or mother only postpartum immunization). There was then an educational portion about pertussis and follow-up questions to determine whether this had changed their views. Results. Of 143 women surveyed over 8 months, 67% had a moderate knowledge score regarding pertussis and its risks; 55% of participants considered Tdap (tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis) to be safe. Only 5% of women reported having discussed pertussis with their physician during their pregnancy. Fifty-seven percent of participants would have agreed to receive Tdap immediately post-partum, and 65% would consider Tdap in the third trimester of a subsequent pregnancy. There was a significant link between pertussis knowledge levels and intent to vaccinate (p < 0.001). Of 29 participants who disagreed with both protective strategies, 45% stated they would consider them after receiving the education about pertussis. Conclusion. A significant proportion of post-partum women had limited knowledge of infant pertussis disease; however prevention strategies were acceptable to a majority of surveyed women. A consideration to improve uptake of either strategy in Manitoba would be to increase the target population's knowledge and awareness of the significance of infant pertussis and the risks associated with pertussis infection, as well as the safety profile of the vaccine. Disclosures. All authors: No reported disclosures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicBacterial Infections and VaccinesFrench-language works237,207