MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2305133861

Mapping the subsurface geometry of the Moyie Anticline, southeastern British Columbia: Implications for mineral

2010· article· en· W2305133861 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kris Vasudevan, Frederick A. Cook

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnticlineGeologySedimentary rockSillGeochemistryMaficPaleontologyTectonics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Application of seismic reflection profiling methods to analyzing the regional and detailed structural and stratigraphic features of the Moyie anticline in the Purcell anticlinorium of southeastern British Columbia has provided new perspectives on subsurface variations that may assist in exploration for sedimentary-hosted mineral deposits. The Moyie anticline is the southernmost of a series of north-plunging nested anticlines and is cored by folded Mesoproterozoic Aldridge Formation turbidites of the Belt-Purcell Supergroup that have been intruded by syndepositional mafic Moyie Sills. Aldridge Formation rocks have been productive sources for Pb-Ag-Zn deposits. Mapping of key stratigraphic markers, delineated by extensive, reflective, and correlatable sill horizons, allows identification of time thickness variations that are likely associated with stratigraphic thickness changes that may assist in future exploration efforts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.122

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological formations and processes→French-language works237,207→