Quels modes de raconter la souffrance ? L’expression du religieux en Haïti après le retrait des ONG
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis le séisme du 12 janvier 2010, le discours humanitaire sur la souffrance cohabite avec les expressions religieuses en Haïti. L’analyse d’entrevues menées dans des camps de déplacés entre septembre 2012 et mai 2013 permet d’exposer les effets du langage humanitaire sur le parler ordinaire des populations haïtiennes touchées par le séisme. Cet article cherche à comprendre la fonction de l’expression religieuse des Haïtiens, notamment dans son interaction avec le langage humanitaire dans l’espace des camps. À partir d’énoncés tirés des récits de résidents de camps de déplacés, il semble possible de percevoir ce qui, dans ces discours religieux, apparaît comme une nouvelle contrainte dans l’expression de la souffrance et ce qui pourrait s’établir, dans le parler ordinaire, comme écart et réappropriation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".