MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2305459710 · doi:10.1484/j.at.3.42

Le palais impérial d’Antioche et son contexte à l’époque de Julien. Réflexions sur l’apport des sources littéraires à l’histoire d’un espace urbain

2009· article· fr· W2305459710 on OpenAlex
Catherine Saliou

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAntiquité Tardive · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchaeology and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtReignPraiseHumanitiesQuarter (Canadian coin)ExcavationStudioArchaeologyArt historyHistoryLiteratureVisual artsPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Julian’s Misopogon was posted in Antioch, according to Malalas’ Chronography, “outside of the palace, at the Tetrapyle of the Elephants, near the Regia”. A few years earlier, the sophist Libanios described the palace and its surroundings in his speech In praise of Antioch. The aim of this article is to bring to light the contribution of the literary sources to the knowledge of the palace district during the third quarter of the 4th century. The first part is devoted to the study of the name “New (city)” which is, in the Late Antiquity, the name of the island where the palace is located. In the second part, the sources relating to the palace and its surroundings, and to the other buildings in the island are systematically analysed: the Tetrapyle of the Elephants, the Regia, the palace itself, the Romanesia Gate, the Campus, and the circus. The circus was excavated, and is still partially visible. However, the archaeological excavation could not date the building. The textual evidence shows that a hippodrome did exist on the island during the reign of Theodosius I, but gives no indication on the date of its construction. The specific contribution of the written sources is to allow the study of the meanings that are attached to the components of the urban space and the way they are embedded in the collective memory and used in the construction of a civic identity. These aspects are explored in the third part of the article. The proximity of the Campus to the palace shows the importance of the military function of the emperor, particulary when in residence in Antioch. The Tetrapyle might have been devoted to the posting of imperial pronoucements, and on the opposite side of the palace, the Romanesia Gate, through which the emperor goes to the Campus, might have been a favoured place for petitioners. The toponyms “Tetrapyle of the Elephants”, “Regia”, “Campus” and “Romanesia Gate” have a clear Roman and Imperial flavour. In such a context, the assessments of Libanios and Malalas concerning the hellenistic date of the urbanization of the island or the attribution of the ornam-entation of the Romanesia Gate to Seleucos must be taken as testimonies of the self-representation of the Antiochenes in Late Antiquity, not as sources about the pre-Roman history of the Island.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.866
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it