New interface management tools and strategies for complex products
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, an interface management model for multidisciplinary products is proposed with the aim of improving communication between design groups with respect to product data. Using a functional representation of products is suggested to have well defined subsystems. When the product structure is designed, the interfaces between its subsystems can be defined using the systematic methodology proposed in this paper. Having a systematic methodology to define interfaces is the first step towards standardizing them. With well-defined interfaces, the number of incompatible design decisions can be reduced. This will reduce new product development time and facilitate subsystem changes. The paper also shows a formal way of modeling interface objects with the purpose of integrating them into product lifecycle management (PLM) software. Interfaces are modeled using object oriented technology since this parallels the object nature of product data and since object technology provides a formalism to integrate interface data into PLM software. Keyword : interface management, interface control document, multidisciplinary product
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it