MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2306243051 · doi:10.1177/0184767815627760

Shakespearean hospitalities in <i>Sir Thomas More</i>

2016· article· en· W2306243051 on OpenAlexaff
James Purkis

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers Élisabéthains A Journal of English Renaissance Studies · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPleaHospitalityCharacter (mathematics)TRACE (psycholinguistics)SovereigntyHost (biology)LiteratureArtHistoryPhilosophyLawLinguisticsPolitical sciencePoliticsTourism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The manuscript play Sir Thomas More contains three pages that may be in Shakespeare’s hand. It is a play replete with instances, and the language, of hospitality. Beginning with the titular character’s plea for universal hospitality to a group of rioting Londoners seeking the removal of ‘strangers’, I trace how the play is pulled between contemporary hospitable discourse’s collapse of the difference between host and guest and the necessity of recognizing the host’s authority. Such a model of competing commonality and sovereignty may offer a ground for rethinking the supposed discontinuity of Shakespeare’s part in the play’s revision.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.011
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers Élisabéthains A Journal of English Renaissance StudiesSame topicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary CriticismFrench-language works237,207