MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2306301151 · doi:10.1525/ncl.2012.67.2.139

“Life is a tragicomedy!”: Maria Edgeworth's <i>Belinda</i> and the Staging of the Realist Novel

2012· article· en· W2306301151 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNineteenth-Century Literature · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature: history, themes, analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVerisimilitudeTragicomedyRealismCharacter (mathematics)ComicsNarrativeIllusionKey (lock)LiteraturePeriod (music)ArtSociologyAestheticsComputer sciencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This essay reveals how Maria Edgeworth integrated dramatic practices into her novel Belinda (1801) as a means to generate realistic effect. In doing so, it not only challenges the notion that the theater was at odds with the novel in this period but also shows that, in a novel such as Belinda, the theater fundamentally undergirds rather than detracts from its verisimilitude. As I demonstrate through careful readings of key “dramatic” scenes in the novel, Lady Delacour's adoption of the mask of the Comic Muse acts as a metonym for the mask of the novel—namely, those narrative techniques that provide the illusion of character depth and authenticity. The essay thus documents a foundational moment in the development of the nineteenth-century novel insofar as it discloses Edgeworth's contention that any novelistic move to establish subjective interiority is as much of a performance as a theatrical one; in other words, realism is theater.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.844
Threshold uncertainty score0.957

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it