MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2306444877 · doi:10.4043/26759-ms

Berth Mooring Influenced by Passing Effect of Ships in a River Channel

2016· article· en· W2306444877 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOffshore Technology Conference Asia · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWave and Wind Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsIntecsea (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFenderMooringMarine engineeringChannel (broadcasting)Line (geometry)EngineeringStructural engineeringElectrical engineeringGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper, a berth mooring for a vessel at a terminal is evaluated by analytical studies. The passing induced loads and motions are calculated for representative vessels moored for offloading in a river channel. The channel is modelled as a prismatic geometry. Passing induced loads are calculated using the ROPES software and are interfaced with ANSYS AQWA with which a series of dynamic mooring simulations are conducted for the moored vessel. The passing induced mooring line tensions, fender reactions, and vessel motions, velocities and accelerations at the moored ship's manifold are evaluated for a series of load conditions and mooring designs. The effects of changing some of the passing parameters on the mooring loads and motions are also evaluated and discussed briefly. Finally, the risks associated with damage of a single line are reviewed and the means to mitigate this risk are commented upon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.369
Threshold uncertainty score0.642

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it