MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2306693489 · doi:10.1016/s0967-0653(97)88656-5

10.1016/s0967-0653(97)88656-5

2000· article· en· W2306693489 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ian E.M. Smith, T.J. Worthington, Richard C. Price, J. A. Gamble

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyMantle (geology)VolcanoBasaltGeochemistryEarth scienceVolcanic arcTectonicsMagmaIsland arcSubductionPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In widely accepted models for tle origin of volcanic axcs at convergent plate margins, magmas originate in subductionmodified peridotitic mantle. Primary arc magrnas are predictably unique in ffierent arcs because of the variety of potential components and processes involved in their generation, but they should sharc the common characteristics of high concentrations of Mg, Ni and Cr, reflecting their mantle origin. An examination of suites of samples taken from tbree southwest Pacific volcanic arcs (the Kermadec, New Zealand and Papuan arcs) shows contrasting geochemical pat[erns that correlate with different tectonic settings. Magmas with primitive chemical characteristics are comparatively rare, and appear to occur where an extensional tectonic se6ing has allowed patls ofrelatively rapid ascenl In typical arc settings, magma ponds at one or more positions above its source and is modified by a combination of fractionation, eruption, assimilalion and recharge prccesses, so that the most primitive magma erupted is i chemically evolved high-Al basalt. The factors that dictate the geochemical nature of magnas in volcanic arcs-are tectonic sefling togefher with the environment (depth) at which primary nantle-derived magmas are modifiedKewords: arcs, primary magma, high-Mg basalt, Eu anomaly, southwest Pacific.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.354

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)1.0001.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.147
Teacher spread0.140 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knitSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207