MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2306841773 · doi:10.1353/ams.2016.0033

Encounters at the Heart of the World: A History of the Mandan People by Elizabeth A. Fenn (review)

2016· article· en· W2306841773 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christophe Boucher

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican studies · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArchaeology and Natural History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomelandWonderManifest destinyHistoryArchaeologyEthnologyGeographyGenealogyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Encounters at the Heart of the World: A History of the Mandan People by Elizabeth A. Fenn Christophe Boucher ENCOUNTERS AT THE HEART OF THE WORLD: A History of the Mandan People. By Elizabeth A. Fenn. New York, NY: Hill and Wang. 2014. Unlike the Cahokians or the Chacoans, the Mandans’ archaeological “footprint” is light. Their traditional homeland along the upper Missouri River in what is today North Dakota only reveals depressions and ditches, not breathtaking mounds and stone edifices. [End Page 151] In national memory, these Siouan-speaking horticulturalists have sunk to near historical oblivion, eclipsed by their equestrian neighbors, such as the Lakotas. In this Pulitzer-award winning monograph, Elizabeth Fenn restores the Mandans to their rightful place in history. As she reminds us, their ancestral homeland may seem today desolate and inhospitable but it was once “one of the most dynamic centers of interaction in North America” (132). At their height (1500–1782), Mandan villages not only seethed with people; they were “vibrant social and commercial hubs” (xiii). A productive agricultural oasis, their territory annually attracted thousands of nomads eager to obtain the foodstuff they lacked, making it a fulcrum of exchange and diplomacy. Its prominence was such that, in 1804, Lewis and Clark still recognized this region as a gateway into the American West. No wonder the Mandans called their homeland “the Heart of the World.” By adopting this perspective in her book, Fenn joins a long list of Native Americanists “Facing East from Indian Country,” to take up Daniel Richter’s book title. What emerges in the process is “an alternative view of American life…” (xv), that shifts our conventional frame of reference. In Fenn’s book, the traditional centers of power (Philadelphia, Quebec City, etc.) fade away, replaced by new locales (On-a-Slant Village, York Factory, etc.) and a new cast of actors (Sheheke, Mato-Tope, etc.) underrepresented in national memory. Once the narrative is thus recast, familiar historical events in America resonate differently. As Fenn shows, for instance, two decades after the Louisiana Purchase, the “‘supremacy’ of the United States” over the Mandans was still theoretical (285). The territorial encroachment of the Lakotas was more palpable than the hegemonic aspirations of distant American leaders. While Fenn focuses on an understudied topic, her work echoes many themes in New Indian History. Notably, she strives to present the Mandans as agents in their history, which was lacking in Roy W. Meyer’s The Village Indians of the Upper Missouri: The Mandans, the Hidatsas, and the Arikaras (1977). This goal is particularly noticeable when she documents the Mandan responses to the scourges afflicting their communities after 1781. Despite devastating epidemics, Lakota expansionism, droughts, and the proliferation of voracious Norway rats, the Mandans (like Karim Tiro’s Oneidas and Pekka Hamalainen’s Comanches) were never passive victims. They elaborated creative strategies to confront cataclysm. They drew on their rich ritual traditions, for example, to reestablish moorings in this “new world.” By studying the history of the Mandans from 1000 C.E. to the mid-1800s, Fenn traces the roots of their resiliency deep in time. Their dynamic pre-contact experience gave them the tools to confront the deleterious effects of the Columbian exchange. Clearly, “the Heart of the World” pulsated long before 1492! Framing her work in such a broad historical continuum proved challenging since very few written sources deal directly with the Mandans before 1800. As is increasingly the case in New Indian History, Fenn supplements her meticulous reading of the ethno-historic evidence with knowledge gleaned from archaeology, ethnography, climatology, dendrochronology, epidemiology, and thermal imaging. Fenn even visited “The Heart of the World” in 2002 and her observations and impressions figure prominently in the text. After all, the lightly interpreted Mandan sites stimulate “the imagination in ways that places like Colonial Williamsburg never will” (3). Just like New Western Historians, Fenn also recognizes that life west of the 98th meridian reflected local environmental specificities. After all, “geography shaped every aspect of Mandan existence” (4). Fenn’s creative narrative structure, especially for the pre-contact period, is also noteworthy. She alternates vignettes of indigenous life before 1800 with relevant descriptions of her...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican studiesSame topicArchaeology and Natural HistoryFrench-language works237,207