MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W230690918

Learning, growing, and navigating occupations in the face of divorce: Adolescents’ daily occupations and meaningfulness following a parental divorce or marital separation

2011· article· en· W230690918 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommonKnowledge Research Repository (Pacific University Oregon) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Therapy Practice and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyFace (sociological concept)Developmental psychologySocial psychologySociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In North America, adolescence is a period of learning, growth, and navigation of roles and occupations that will ultimately influence later occupational choices (Furstenberg, 2000). While navigating their social roles and exploring who they are and wish to be, adolescents are also forming their views on social norms along with their social and occupational identities. A parental divorce or martial separation at this period has been depicted as wholly negative for adolescents, leading to problems in development and adherence to social norms and values (Kelly, 2000). A parental divorce or marital separation will affect adolescents’ abilities to engage in some of the daily occupations that they need or want to due to changed economic, social, familial and emotional factors in their lives. The meanings that adolescents associate with occupations may also change at this time, which will impact their internalization of lifelong occupations.\nIn this study, we use a participatory critical visual methodology (de Lange, Mitchell & Stuart, 2007) to explore how adolescents experience parental divorce or marital separation. From our critical perspective, ‘adolescence,’ ‘family,’ and the nature and affects of divorce are all culturally constructed, therefore we have limited our ventures into the literature to North American, English-language studies that were published in roughly the last decade, and are limiting our data collection to the Toronto Jewish community, a culturally similar group to further solidify the cultural and social contexts in which family and divorce are constructed. We are working with both the adolescents themselves as well as service providers – including social workers, counselors, guidance counselors and teachers among others – to give anecdotal information on this population as well as to provide insight into the systems and social barriers that these adolescents and their families must navigate.\nWith this research we hope to contribute to the research that presents asset-based approaches to adolescent life following a parental divorce or martial separation, as well as the information that comes from the perspective of the adolescents themselves. We also hope to further explore occupations and occupation building in adolescents. Finally, we hope to add to the growing literature on the use of critical visual methodologies in both the field of occupational science, and in health research in general.\nObjectives for discussion period: The role of adolescent occupations and occupation acquisition The North American construction of ‘family’ and ‘divorce,’ and how they may affect societal perceptions of how a divorce will impact occupational engagement for teenagers Structural and financial impacts on occupational engagement What participatory research can offer occupational science, rather than researcher-driven inquiry

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.277
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.136
GPT teacher head0.436
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it