Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le premier Congrès international des américanistes, qui se tint à Nancy en 1875, fut le théâtre d’une violente querelle opposant Léon de Rosny, philologue positiviste, à Émile Petitot, missionnaire de la Congrégation des Oblats de Marie-Immaculée. Les enjeux étaient multiples : si la définition des critères du savoir légitime constituait le principal objectif des organisateurs du congrès, les tenants de la doctrine chrétienne vinrent y défendre, contre le polygénisme de l’anthropologie naissante, l’unité adamique de la race humaine et l’origine asiatique des Amérindiens. C’est toutefois lors de la discussion d’un manuscrit prétendument iroquois que se cristallisèrent les enjeux implicites d’une querelle qui s’attacha soudain à l’origine et à l’authenticité d’une écriture amérindienne : l’insuffisance de l’érudition acquise par le philologue en bibliothèque rejoignit alors la cécité résultant de la relation essentiellement prosélyte que le missionnaire avait établie avec les Amérindiens. L’article se conclut par le rétablissement de la vérité historique : le manuscrit était, en fait, micmac.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".