MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2307234090 · doi:10.7202/1077309ar

Représentations culturelles des troubles de santé mentale chez les immigrants et réfugiés de l’Afrique francophone subsaharienne au Canada

2015· article· fr· W2307234090 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Annabel Levesque, Rhéa Rocque

Bibliographic record

VenueAlterstice Revue internationale de la recherche interculturelle · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicMigration, Health and Trauma
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversité de Saint-Boniface
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’étude vise à décrire les représentations culturelles des troubles de santé mentale des immigrants et des réfugiés d’Afrique subsaharienne vivant au Canada, selon trois des composantes du modèle de l’autorégulation de la maladie, soit les causes, la trajectoire et les traitements. Cinquante personnes ont pris part à une entrevue. Elles attribuent les troubles mentaux à des facteurs sociaux (comme le stress), individuels (comme les comportements), biologiques et génétiques et enfin surnaturels. Elles anticipent une évolution variable des troubles selon le type de maladie et les facteurs en cause. Selon les participants, certains cas peuvent disparaître ou du moins être contrôlés, mais seulement si la personne reçoit du soutien et des soins ou si elle utilise certaines stratégies individuelles visant à améliorer son état. Les interventions prennent la forme de soutien social et d’interventions médicales, psychothérapeutiques et traditionnelles ou religieuses. Les retombées pratiques de l’étude sont discutées.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.142

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlterstice Revue internationale de la recherche interculturelleSame topicMigration, Health and TraumaFrench-language works237,207