MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2307337832 · doi:10.1093/alcalc/agv076.110

SY27-2RELAPSE VULNERABILITY AS A BRAIN NETWORK STATE: STUDIES IN HUMANS AND RATS

2015· article· en· W2307337832 on OpenAlexaff
Wolfgang H. Sommer, Simone Pfarr, Sabine Vollstädt‐Klein, Derik Hermann, Georg Weil, Kevin Mann, Matthew Brown, Petri Hyytiä, Santiago Canals, Alejandro Cosa‐Linan, Wolfgang Weber‐Fahr

Bibliographic record

VenueAlcohol and Alcoholism · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicStress Responses and Cortisol
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuroimagingVulnerability (computing)NeuroscienceMagnetic resonance imagingPsychologyFunctional magnetic resonance imagingMedicineComputer scienceRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bringing novel medications from preclinical to clinical development is challenging, especially when efficacy predictors are based on subjective assessments. Neuroimaging methods such as magnet resonance imaging (MRI) may allow for objective human-animal comparisons and thus to identify imaging signatures that are comparable between patients with alcohol use disorders (AUD) and animal models. Such signatures may represent ‘relapse prone' network states that should be positively modulated (i.e. towards normal states) by effective pharmacological treatments. Here, we report results from global mapping of brain activity using resting state functional MRI (rsfMRI) and manganese enhanced MRI (MEMRI) in an established rat model of abstinence from alcohol dependence (i.e. postdependent rats). We found abstinence related changes in brain regions known to be involved in the addiction circuitry but also regions currently not in the focus of alcohol research. The effects of naltrexone, a clinical approved treatment for relapse prevention in AUD, on brain activity patters in postdependent rats were also investigated. Comparable rsfMRI experiments in alcoholic patients and healthy controls using rsfMRI point to altered connectivity in the default mode network and of limbic regions in alcoholics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.420
Threshold uncertainty score0.875

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.144
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlcohol and AlcoholismSame topicStress Responses and CortisolFrench-language works237,207