MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2307477415

Snježana Grković Janović, The Diary of Lujza, Srednja Europa, Zagreb 2008

2009· article· en· W2307477415 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marica Karakaš Obradov

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare Systems and Public Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTheologyCroatianHumanitiesArtPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lujza Janovic – Wagner (Zagreb, 15. sijecnja 1907. - Zagreb, 17. veljace 1945.) s pravom bi se mogla nazivati hrvatskom Florence Nightingale. Glavna je protagonistica svih događanja vezanih uz povijest sestrinstva, zdravstvene zastite i socijalne skrbi u Hrvatskoj. Naime, Lujza Wagner se nakon skolovanja u svicarskom internatu vratila u Zagreb i, na iznenađenje obitelji, umjesto muzicke akademije odabrala je poziv sestre pomocnice. Diplomirala je 1926. i postala bliska suradnica dr. Andrije Stampara. Znanje o sestrinstvu nadogradila je na Public Health Nursing kao Rockefellerova stipendistica na New Haven University te na University of Toronto. Sudjelovala je u osnivanju i radu Saveza sestra Kraljevine Jugoslavije, Drustvu sestra pomocnica Hrvatske, a u Zagrebu je osnovala prvu ustanovu za sestrinsku zdravstvenu patronažu i socijalni rad s obiteljima – Srediste sestara pomocnica. Sestra Lujza bila je i dugogodisnja urednica casopisa Sestrinska rijec. Gotovo sezdeset godina nakon Lujzine smrti njena kci Snježana Janovic - Grkovic priredila je majcin dnevnik pisan u bremenitim vremenima Drugog svjetskog rata. Priređivacica, inace spisateljica i dugogodisnja socijalna radnica, dala je vrijedne i opsirne napomene i prijevode u predgovoru i biljeskama važne za razumijevanje sadržaja dnevnika. Lujzin dnevnik. Dnevnicki zapisi Lujze Janovic - Wagner iz Drugoga svjetskog rata opisuje događanja u Splitu i na Bracu u vrijeme Drugoga svjetskog rata.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.620
Threshold uncertainty score0.650

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHealthcare Systems and Public HealthFrench-language works237,207