MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2307572460 · doi:10.1161/str.43.suppl_1.a168

Abstract 168: Prevalence And Characterization Of Neuropsychological Deficits In Lacunar Stroke Patients. The Secondary Prevention Of Small Subcortical Strokes (sps3) Trial

2012· article· en· W2307572460 on OpenAlexaff
Oscar Benavente, Lesly A. Pearce, Claudia Jacova, Robert G. Hart

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDementiaNeuropsychologyStroke (engine)Lacunar strokeCohortCognitionNeuropsychological assessmentAudiologyCognitive impairmentVerbal fluency testMemory impairmentPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPhysical therapyPsychiatryInternal medicineDiseaseIschemic stroke

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Though the important role of lacunar stroke in cognitive impairment and dementia is widely recognized, to date no well-characterized pattern of neuropsychological (NP) impairment has been defined in this stroke subtype. Methods: SPS3 is a multi-center international randomized trial that included a well-defined cohort of MRI proven lacunar stroke patients. For the purpose of this analysis we consider NP testing data collected at study entry for all English speaking participants enrolled in North America. The hour-long NPT was administered by a certified examiner and covered a wide range of domains. Raw test scores were converted to standardized scores using normative data which were then entered into a principal component analysis to identify distinct cognitive domains measured. NP status was defined as Not Cognitively Impaired (NCI) and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) if there was impairment in memory and/or non-memory domains. Results: Of the 3020 SPS3 participants, 1632 were included in these analyses. Most (85%) scored ≥95 on the Barthel Index. Performances (z-scores) on all NPT were lower than normal for age, and for education and gender. The largest deficits were seen on tests of episodic memory (mean -0.92 to -0.68), verbal fluency (mean -0.89), and motor dexterity (median -2.5). The magnitude of cognitive impairment increased with higher Rankin scores (p < 0.001). Principal component analysis revealed memory and two non-memory domains (perceptual-verbal processing speed, executive functioning). Based on these domains, NP status was 53% NCI, 17% amnestic MCI, 17% amnestic multidomain MCI, and 13% non-amnestic MCI. Conclusion: In this large and well-defined cohort of lacunar stroke patients, MCI was present in half of the cohort. The most significant impairments were found on tests of processing speed, motor dexterity, executive function, and episodic memory. Episodic memory appears a central feature in this cohort and should be assessed carefully in future clinical studies and trials directed at subcortical stroke populations. NP deficits appear to be more prevalent than functional deficits (Barthel) in survivors of lacunar stroke.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery→French-language works237,207→