MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2307949855 · doi:10.14288/1.0104686

Isolating mechanisms and speciation in Gasterosteus aculeatus L.

2011· article· en· W2307949855 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
D. W. Hagen

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotanical Research and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGasterosteusGenetic algorithmBiologyZoologyEvolutionary biologyFisheryFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intensive field observations were conducted on a small British Columbia coastal stream for two years, supplemented by laboratory rearing and experiment. Stress was placed upon possible isolating mechanisms, as outlined by Mayr, that might serve to keep the marine stickleback (trachurus) and the freshwater form (leiurus)distinct. Lelurus permanently occupies the upper reaches of the stream; trachurus is anadromous, but enters the lower reaches to breed in "pure" freshwater. Between the breeding ground of the two, where some coexistence occurs, hybridization between leiurus and trachurus is extensive, but it is restricted to very narrow zones both in Little Campbell River near Vancouver and in certain Vancouver Island streams. Morphological analysis provides firm circumstantial evidence that hybrids are plentiful and that back-crossing occurs. Hybridization is confirmed by rearing experiments in the laboratory with crosses in all combinations. Most backcrossing is to the freshwater race and this is considered in detail. Behavioural experiments demonstrated the absence of mate preference; random mating occurs with respect to ethological isolation and hybrids perform courtship and parental care activities normally. Rearing hybrids uniformly and in all conbinations demonstrated the absence of genetic incompatibility, and vigorous offspring were produced. Fertile hybrids are abundant in the wild, but the sexes are seasonally isolated from one another. Behavoiral and genetic blocks to hybridization are absent, and thus there is no means to prevent hybridization where leiurus and trachurus come together. But evidence from the field and from preference tests demonstrated that ecological isolating mechanisms are very powerful barriers to hybridization. This is enforced to some extent by partial seasonal isolation, but early spawning migrants make a major contribution to hybridization in the Little Campbell River. Several factors probably operate to cause very narrow hybrid zones in stickle-backs, including a sedentary habit, habitat preference, and hybrid inferiority outside the hybrid zone. The latter could not be detected inside the hybrid zone. The complex of Isolating mechanisms found may well produce stable hybrid zones over long periods of time, and is discussed. Reinforcement of ecological isolating mechanisms probably occurs, and Moore's criticism of the spread of reinforced genotypes would not apply in this instance. Adaptation and consequent ecological isolating mechanisms are the cause of hybrid inferiority. In this instance pre and postmating mechanisms cannot be separated, for they go hand in hand. Geographic speciation is possible but problematical, and sympatric speciation cannot be excluded as a plausible explanation of divergence between sticklebacks as a result of disruptive selection. Distributional patterns of leiurus can best be explained by repeated and independent origins from trachurus. The two forms fulfill the species definition by Mayr and remain reproductively isolated, have well developed isolating mechanisms, and show considerable genetic divergence, much of it polygenic. There is no evidence that, introgression occurs, but a reverse cline in leiurus as well as very narrow hybrid zones demonstrates that selection severely restricts gene flow. Reproductive isolation between marine and freshwater forms seems to be widespread around the hemisphere.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.941

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicBotanical Research and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207