Helminths of Anolis nitens (Squamata, Polychrotidae), from Brazil and Ecuador, South America
Bibliographic record
Abstract
METHODS AND MATERIALS Eighteen individuals of Anolis nitens collected by LJv were borrowed from the Department of Herpetology, Sam Noble Museum of Natural History (OMNH), University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA. Eight were from Brazil (mean snout-vent length, SvL = 51.0 mm ± 12.2 SD, range = 30-60 mm, Acre State, OMNH 3700037007, 5.0 km N Porto Walter, inland from the Rio Jurua, 8°15’S, 72°46’W, collected FebruaryApril, 1996); ten were from Ecuador (mean SvL = 70.7 mm ± 6.7 SD, range = 60-80 mm, Sucumbios Province, OMNH 40392-40401, Reserva Faunistica Cuyabeno, Neotropic Turis, 00°00’, 76°00’W, collected February-April, 1994). Lizards were field fixed in 10% formalin and preserved in 70% ethanol. The stomachs had previously been removed for an ecological study (vitt et al., 2001). Small and large intestines, lungs, liver and body cavities were examined for helminths under a dissecting microscope. Nematodes were cleared in glycerol on a glass slide under a coverslip and examined with a compound microscope. Acanthocephalans were stained in hematoxylin, mounted in Canada balsam and studied as whole-mounts. Terminology is in accordance with Bush et al. (1997).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".