MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2308448763

Statistical Evaluation of Value at Risk Models for Estimating Agricultural Risk

2014· article· en· W2308448763 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Statistical and Econometric Methods · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFinancial Risk and Volatility Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsValue at riskSkewnessKurtosisEconometricsStatisticsEWMA chartMathematicsParametric statisticsEconomicsComputer scienceRisk managementControl chart
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper develops a skewness and leptokurtic modified VaR model with a mixture weight parameter that blends the Cornish-Fisher and EWMA methods. We estimate and evaluate five existing parametric VaR specifications using weekly returns for Canadian feedlot cattle feeding margin data and Maple Leaf Foods stock return data. The estimation of VaR based on EWMA method yields the most satisfactory results particularly for returns with positive skewness or leptokurtic tails. Meanwhile, the VaR forecasts obtained using the Cornish-Fisher method provides a relatively better tracking of the observed returns compared to the other methods, and therefore, has lower forecast error. Our proposed model allows users to determine the value of VaR based on their own risk preferences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.458
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it