MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2308573983 · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2015.2460460

A Distributed Filtering Scheme to Mitigate Harmonics in Residential Distribution Systems

2015· article· en· W2308573983 on OpenAlexafffund
Pooya Bagheri, Wilsun Xu, Tianyu Ding

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Quality and Harmonics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersAlberta Innovates - Technology Futures
KeywordsHarmonicsScheme (mathematics)HarmonicFilter (signal processing)Electronic engineeringTotal harmonic distortionHarmonic analysisInterference (communication)Computer scienceEngineeringElectronic filterVoltageElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel scheme to mitigate harmonic distortions in modern residential distribution systems. The scheme deploys multiple low-voltage filters in randomly selected locations of a distribution system. The main challenges of such a distributed filtering scheme, cost of installation and hardware, are solved through an innovative filter configuration and installation concept, namely, the filter is a 240 V device that can be easily plugged into the sockets of utility revenue meters. Analytical, simulation, and economic studies have been conducted to understand the filter design parameters, performance characteristics, and cost implications. As an example application, the scheme is evaluated for mitigating an actual harmonic-caused telephone interference problem. The results show that the proposed scheme can be a promising option to reduce the harmonic distortions in selected areas of a distribution system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power DeliverySame topicPower Quality and HarmonicsFrench-language works237,207