MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2308698272 · doi:10.1109/iccnc.2016.7440549

Optimizing the Lagrange multiplier in perceptually-friendly high efficiency video coding for mobile applications

2016· article· en· W2308698272 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2016 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Coding and Compression Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLagrange multiplierEncoderComputer scienceRate–distortion optimizationCoding (social sciences)Video qualityQuantization (signal processing)Data compressionReal-time computingAlgorithmComputer visionMultiview Video CodingMathematical optimizationMathematicsMetric (unit)Video processingVideo trackingEngineeringStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In mobile applications, the amount of memory and bandwidth is restricted. Efficient compression of video is essential to provide better quality streaming on a mobile device. High efficiency video coding (HEVC) standard provide substantial bitrate savings compared with the previous standards. The compression efficiency of HEVC has been improved by integration of a perceptual video quality metric inside the encoder. In the rate distortion optimization process, PSNR-HVS has been used to measure distortion for the coding unit mode selection. In this paper, we find the optimal Lagrange multiplier based on the quantization parameter. Experimental results for various test sequences show the compression efficiency of the perceptual HEVC will be improved by finding the optimal Lagrange multiplier.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score0.714

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it