MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2309124216 · doi:10.1186/1471-2202-16-s1-o4

Large-scale analysis of brain-wide electrophysiological diversity reveals novel characterization of mammalian neuron types

2015· article· en· W2309124216 on OpenAlexaff
Shreejoy J. Tripathy, Dmitry Tebaykin, Brenna Li, Ogan Marcarci, Lilah Toker, Paul Pavlidis

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Neuroscience · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuroscienceElectrophysiologyNeuroinformaticsNeuronScale (ratio)Cognitive scienceBiologyComputer sciencePsychologyCartographyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Brains achieve efficient function through implementing a division of labor, in which different neurons serve distinct computational roles. One striking way in which neuron types differ is in their electrophysiology properties. These properties arise through expression of combinations of ion channels that collectively define the computations that a neuron performs on its inputs and its role within its larger circuit. Though the electrophysiology of many neuron types has been previously characterized, these data exist across thousands of journal articles, making cross-study neuron-to-neuron comparisons difficult. Here, we present NeuroElectro, a public database where physiological properties for the majority of mammalian neuron types have been compiled through semi-automated literature text-mining and expert curation. The corresponding web application, at http://www.neuroelectro.org, provides a rich dynamic interface for visualizing and comparing physiological information across neuron types; conveniently linking extracted data back to its primary reference. Mining the database content after normalization for methodological differences, we show that there exist but 5-9 major neuron classes in terms of electrophysiological properties, which separate largely based on cell size and basal levels of excitability (Figure ​(Figure11). Figure 1 Hierarchical clustering of diverse neuron types on the basis of electrophysiological similarity. Electrophysiological parameters are obtained from the NeuroElectro database via literature-mining and are normalized to account for variability in experimental ... As an example of how this resource can help answer fundamental questions in neuroscience, we integrate NeuroElectro with neuronal gene expression from public datasets like the Allen Brain Atlas. We show that simple statistical models can accurately predict features of a neuron's electrophysiological phenotype given information of its gene expression alone. We further investigate these models to ask which genes, of the 20K in the genome, are most predictive of neuron physiology. We find that while ion channel-related genes provide significant predictive power, the most predictive gene classes surprisingly correspond to G-proteins and transcription factors, suggesting the involvement of hundreds of diverse genes in regulating a neuron's computational function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0090.007
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC NeuroscienceSame topicNeural dynamics and brain functionFrench-language works237,207