MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2309138673 · doi:10.1109/tia.2015.2510507

Maximum Power Point Tracking Control of IPMSG Incorporating Loss Minimization and Speed Sensorless Schemes for Wind Energy System

2015· article· en· W2309138673 on OpenAlexafffund
Nirav Patel

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Turbine Control Systems
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaximum power point trackingControl theory (sociology)Wind speedWind powerMaximum power principlePermanent magnet synchronous generatorTurbinePower optimizerVariable speed wind turbineElectronic speed controlPower (physics)MinificationComputer scienceEngineeringPhotovoltaic systemMagnetVoltageControl (management)Electrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the variable-speed generation system, the wind turbine (WT) can be operated at maximum power operating points by adjusting the shaft speed optimally. This paper presents a novel maximum power point tracking (MPPT)-based control of interior permanent-magnet (IPM) synchronous generator incorporating loss minimization algorithm (LMA). In the proposed method, without requiring the knowledge of wind speed, air density, or turbine parameters, MPPT algorithm generates optimum speed command for speed control loop of vector-controlled machine side converter. The MPPT algorithm uses the estimated active power output of the generator as its input and generates command speed so that maximum power is transferred to the dc link. The proposed control system also incorporates a LMA to minimize the losses in the generator and hence to improve the efficiency of the wind energy conversion system (WECS). A speed sensorless scheme is also incorporated to increase the reliability of the system. The performance of the proposed adaptive MPPT control of wind generator incorporating loss minimization and speed sensorless schemes is tested in both simulation and experiment at variable wind speed conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industry ApplicationsSame topicWind Turbine Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207