MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2309217041

Infliximab use in patients with Crohn's disease: quality of life, costs and resource use.

2006· article· en· W2309217041 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Chantal L Koelewijn, A.J.P. Schrijvers, Bas Oldenburg

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInfliximabCrohn's diseaseIncidence (geometry)Quality of life (healthcare)Internal medicineDiseaseMaintenance therapySurgeryInflammatory bowel diseaseRefractory (planetary science)GastroenterologyChemotherapy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Crohn’s disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract which primarily affects young adults, with the highest incidence rates reported from Northern Europe, the United Kingdom and North America ranging from 6.9 to 15.6 cases per 100.000 person-years. The course of disease is characterised by episodes of remission and flare-up. The impact on the physical, social, as well as the emotional well-being of patients is substantial and the disease profoundly decreases the quality of life (QoL). The treatment of CD is unsatisfactory, since none of the existing treatments such as aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, immunosuppressive drugs or surgery are curative. Although these treatments have a positive effect on most patients, there is a high incidence of relapse and particularly morbidity from side effects. Infliximab (Remicade), a monoclonal antibody directed against tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-a), was introduced in 1998 and has revolutionised treatment. It is indicated for fistulising CD and the treatment of moderately to severely active luminal CD resistant to conventional therapy. The initial response rates for these indications are 61 to 69% and 58 to 65%, respectively. An infusion of 5 mg/kg infliximab can be given as induction treatment at week 0, 2 and 6, or as maintenance treatment every eight weeks after induction treatment. Maintenance therapy sustains fistula closure, clinical remission and clinical response significantly more than induction treatment only. This implicates an additional therapeutic option for patients previously thought to be refractory to therapy. Although the efficacy of infliximab treatment in CD patients is proven, prescription of infliximab is hampered in daily practice due to its costs (the Netherlands: up to € 14,000 yearly) and the funding system (such as in the Netherlands, Belgium, Canada and the USA). In general, CD has an expensive course of disease, since diagnosis is at an early age and life expectancy is normal. Annual direct medical costs for CD patients are predominantly caused by surgery and other inpatient services, such as hospitalisation, resulting in 81% of the costs, whereas medications only account for 10% of the costs. All other costs are produced by initial diagnostic workups, outpatient services and long-term complications. Annual costs for CD patients per year are difficult to obtain since costs depend on the natural course of the disease. Feagan et al. estimated annual costs varying from US $ 6,277 to $ 37,135 by employing different disease severity groups. Remarkable is the fact that only 2% of the CD patients generate 28.9% of the total costs. Unemployment, disability compensation, compromising of professional career, lost time from work and early retirement are indirect non-medical costs of CD which are difficult to assess but account for high costs to society. An average of 25% of patients with moderate to severe luminal CD in the USA, Europe, Canada and Israel received disability compensation, 39% were unemployed with only 14% of them feeling well enough to work. A Swedish study, which used Swedish national registry data to calculate costs for both ulcerative colitis and CD, reported annual indirect costs at US $ 58.4 million for 40,000 patients, which is a twofold higher than the direct costs. Remission of CD increases employment and is associated with a reduced number of hospitalisations and operations, as well as a normalised QoL. Because infliximab can induce and sustain remission in most patients with refractory and fistulising CD, the most severe type of the disease, this strategy could be cost-effective despite its costs. The aim of this review is to critically appraise the costutility and cost-effectiveness of infliximab in patients with CD by summarising all available evidence with respect to the effect of infliximab on QoL, medical costs and use of resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→