Novel <scp>PITX</scp>2 gene mutations in patients with Axenfeld‐Rieger syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Mutations in the bicoid-like transcription factor PITX2 gene often result in Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome (ARS), an autosomal-dominant inherited disorder. We report here the discovery and characterization of novel PITX2 deletions in a small kindred with ARS. METHODS: Two familial patients (father and son) from a consanguineous family were examined in the present study. Patient DNA samples were screened for PITX2 mutations by DNA sequencing and for copy number variation by SYBR Green quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis. RESULTS: We report a novel deletion involving the coding region of PITX2 in both patients. The minimum size of the deletion is 1 421 914 bp that spans one upstream regulatory element (CE4), PITX2 and a minimum of 13 neighbouring genes. The maximum size of the deletion is 3 789 983 bp. The proband (son) additionally possesses a novel 2-bp deletion in a non-coding exon of the remaining PITX2 allele predicted to alter correct splicing. CONCLUSION: Our findings implicate a novel deletion of the PITX2 gene in the pathogenesis of ARS in the affected family. This ARS family presented with an atypical and extremely severe phenotype that resulted in four miscarriages and the death at 10 months of age of a sib of the proband. As the phenotypic manifestations in the proband are more severe than that of the father, we hypothesize that the deletion of the entire PITX2 allele plus a novel 2-bp deletion (observed in the proband) within the remaining PITX2 allele together contributed to the atypical ARS presentation in this family. This is the first study reporting on bi-allelic changes of PITX2 potentially contributing to a more severe ARS phenotype.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".