Update on Ozone-Depleting Substances (ODSs) and Other Gases of Interest to the Montreal Protocol
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter concerns atmospheric changes in ozone-depleting substances (ODSs), such as chlorofluorocarbons\n(CFCs), halons, chlorinated solvents (e.g., CCl<sub>4</sub> and CH<sub>3</sub>CCl<sub>3</sub>) and hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), which are\ncontrolled under the Montreal Protocol. Furthermore, the chapter updates information about ODSs not controlled\nunder the Protocol, such as methyl chloride (CH<sub>3</sub>Cl) and very short-lived substances (VSLSs). In addition to depleting\nstratospheric ozone, many ODSs are potent greenhouse gases.<br/><br/>\nMole fractions of ODSs and other species are primarily measured close to the surface by global or regional monitoring\nnetworks. The surface data can be used to approximate a mole fraction representative of the global or hemispheric\ntropospheric abundance. Changes in the tropospheric abundance of an ODS result from a difference between\nthe rate of emissions into the atmosphere and the rate of removal from it. For gases that are primarily anthropogenic\nin origin, the difference between northern and southern hemispheric mole fractions is related to the global emission\nrate because these sources are concentrated in the northern hemisphere. [...]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it