MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2309631222 · doi:10.1049/iet-map.2015.0279

Rapid multi‐objective design optimisation of compact microwave couplers by means of physics‐based surrogates

2016· article· en· W2309631222 on OpenAlexafffund
Sławomir Kozieł, Adrian Bekasiewicz, Piotr Kurgan, J.W. Bandler

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Microwaves Antennas & Propagation · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaIcelandic Centre for Research
KeywordsMicrowaveElectronic engineeringPhysicsMicrowave transmissionComputer scienceEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors introduce a methodology for fast multi‐objective design optimisation of miniaturised microwave couplers. The approach exploits the surrogate‐based optimisation paradigm with an underlying low‐fidelity model constructed from an equivalent circuit of the structure under consideration, corrected through implicit and frequency space mapping. A fast prediction tool obtained this way is subsequently optimised by a multi‐objective evolutionary algorithm to identify an initial approximation of the Pareto front, that is, a set of designs representing the best possible trade‐offs between conflicting objectives. The correction/optimisation of the surrogate is then iterated by design space confinement and segmentation based on a Pareto set representation obtained thus far in the process. This aims at improving the surrogate model accuracy in the vicinity of the Pareto‐optimal solutions. The technique is demonstrated by two design examples of compact rat‐race couplers. Experimental validation is also provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET Microwaves Antennas & PropagationSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207