FP556PREDICTORS OF TRANSFER TO HOME HEMODIALYSIS AFTER DEFINITIVE PERITONEAL DIALYSIS COMPLETION
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction and Aims: Long-term peritoneal dialysis (PD) is often limited by technique failure and a significant proportion of PD patients are eventually transferred to hemodialysis. In countries promoting home dialysis, home hemodialysis (HHD) has been identified as an attractive alternative for patients experiencing PD technique failure. Nonetheless, there is still a paucity of data regarding predictors of transfer to HHD after PD completion, which is the main objective of this study. Methods: This registry study included all Australian and New Zealand patients treated with PD in the first 90 days after renal replacement therapy initiation, between 2000 and 2012. Definitive PD completion was defined by hemodialysis treatment for 180 days or more. Patients with definitive PD completion were further categorized as ‘transferred to HHD’ if they initiated HHD less than 180 days after PD ending (first day of hemodialysis). Predictors of transfer to HHD (versus chronic transfer to facility hemodialysis) were evaluated through a multivariable logistic regression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".