MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2309980713 · doi:10.14288/1.0097533

Numerical and functional responses of British Columbia trawlers

2010· article· en· W2309980713 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael F. Lapointe

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine and fisheries research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Numerical responses were examined in the movement of trawlers among seven aggregate fishing areas off the British Columbia coast. Three hypotheses for movement patterns were tested: (1) Movement follows traditional patterns, (2) Movement equalizes the gross dollar returns to effort (LPE$) in each area, and (3) Movement maintains relative LPE$ in each area. On the interannual time scale, I rejected the Equalize LPE$ hypothesis, but failed to reject either the Traditional Patterns or Maintain Relative LPE$ hypothesis. On the intra-annual time scale, I rejected both LPE$ hypotheses, but was unable to reject the Traditional Patterns hypothesis, although traditional movement patterns were evidently being modified by changes in the timing of LPE$ in all the areas and by fishing regulations in two of the seven areas. Three assumptions of the Equalize LPE$ hypothesis were violated, and accounting for violations (especially assumptions concerning movement and areas specific costs) would result in smaller differences in LPE$ between areas and between years within areas. Numerical responses have implications for anticipating the responses of fishing fleets to changes in regulations and for evaluating changes in the economic benefits of alternative fishing areas. Functional responses were examined in a multispecies fishery in Hecate Strait. Two similar techniques for estimating the abundance of exploited fish populations were compared: (1) Virtual Population Analysis (VP A) and (2) Catch-at-age analysis with auxiliary information (CAGEAN). Estimates for each of three species (Pacific cod, English sole, and rock sole) from both techniques were sensitive to the choice of natural mortality rate but insensitive to the choice of fishing mortality rate. In most cases, abundance and catchability estimates from alternative input parameters were highly correlated and had very similar time trends. Similar time trends in estimates were also obtained from the two techniques when the best estimates of input parameters were used. Estimates of abundances, catchabilities and catch per predator from both techniques were used to examine functional responses of trawlers to fish abundance. I compared the fit of three alternative single species functional response models: (1) a linear model (type I), (2) a saturating model (type II), and (3) a generalized equation that could mimic four different responses (types I-IV) depending on its parameter values. The generalized equation predicted sigmoid (type III) functional responses for 11 of the 12 data sets. However, only 5 of the model comparisons were statistically significant; all five indicated that a sigmoid response was most consistent with the data. Single species mortality models Fit most data sets poorly, although in most cases, the form of the mortality curve was consistent with the corresponding functional response. I also fit two alternative multispecies functional response models and examined one mechanism, switching, that could result in type III responses. Multispecies functional response and mortality models often resulted in much better fits than single species models for each species. I failed to detect switching in any of the data sets, although the power of the tests of the switching hypothesis was low in most cases. Type III functional responses and multispecies functional responses have implications for: (1) interpretations of abundance indices based on catch per unit of fishing effort, (2) equilibrium yield vs. abundance or harvest rate relationships and (3) simulation models used to evaluate alternative harvest strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.704
Threshold uncertainty score0.589

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→Same topicMarine and fisheries research→French-language works237,207→