Determination and Interpretation of Texture Evolution during Deformation of a Zirconium Alloy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Worldwide, crystal plasticity models are currently developed to predict texture development during processing of material. Such models require a precise knowledge of the active deformation mechanisms. The activation energy for certain deformation modes will change with temperature and also depend on the chemistry of the alloy as well as the microstructure. Deformation mechanisms were studied in ZIRLO™ during room and high-temperature uniaxial compression testing. Materials with a strong crystallographic basal texture and a more random texture due to β-quenching were investigated with the aim of establishing the effect of temperature, microstructure, and texture on the active deformation modes during the initial stages of deformation. First, specimens were strained at room temperature, 180°C and 300°C to 2 % and 5 % or 10 % total strain and subsequently analyzed by Electron Back Scatter Diffraction (EBSD) to determine the texture evolution. It was found that a dramatic texture change was observed for all testing temperatures in the strongly textured specimen after only 5 % total strain, which can only be understood in terms of tensile twinning of {10 1¯2} ⟨1¯011⟩ being active mainly at room temperature and compressive twinning of {11 2¯2} ⟨1¯1¯23⟩ being operational at room and elevated temperature. The β-quenched specimens did not show any evidence of texture change when strained to 10 %. In-situ intergranular strains were measured by time-of-flight neutron diffraction during continuous compressive loading. This information enabled the development of a crystal plasticity finite element model (CPFEM), which was subsequently used to predict the stress state in individual grains. It was found that in the strongly textured material the spread of intergranular strain in the {0002} grain family (normal pointing towards the ND direction) results in some grains being in compression even though the mean stresses are tensile, which could explain the activation of the observed compressive twinning. The crystal plasticity model also demonstrated that the observed texture changes in the strongly textured material, including those at high temperature, cannot be explained by slip alone even when ⟨c+a⟩ slip is considered. In addition, the model showed that the dramatic difference in yield strength of the two conditions studied here cannot be solely attributed to the difference in texture but that grain size plays an important role.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it