Lipoprotein (a): a promising target in the treatment of stenotic valvular diseases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main findings of the study published by Hojo et al.1 in this edition of the journal are (i) valvular heart disease (VHD), and particularly, aortic regurgitation (AR) and mitral regurgitation (MR) are highly prevalent in patients with peripheral vascular disease (PAD), and (ii) higher circulating levels of lipoprotein a (Lp(a)) are associated with increased risk of aortic (AS) and mitral (MS) valve stenosis. In this large series of 861 patients with PAD referred to Kitakanto Hospital in Japan, 43.6% had VHD at echocardiographic examination: 26.8% AR, 19.7% MR, 5.9% AS, 1.3% MS, and 9.4% tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Not surprisingly, older age was associated with increased prevalence of all types of VHD, except MS. Reduced glomerular filtration was associated with AR, MR, and AS. However, the most striking observation of this study1 was that high levels of Lp(a) were independently associated with increased prevalence of stenotic valvular lesions but not of regurgitant lesions. Fibrocalcific degeneration of the aortic valve cusps is, by far, the most frequent cause of AS.2 Although rheumatic disease remains the most frequent aetiology of MS, degenerative disease may also occur in elderly people. All cases of MS documented in the series of Hojo et al.1 were of non-rheumatic aetiology. Degenerative MS is characterized by calcification of the mitral annulus and of the leaflets (predominantly at their base). With ageing of the population, the prevalence of degenerative valvular stenosis (AS and/or MS) has increased exponentially.2 No pharmacological treatment is currently available to prevent the development or reduce the progression of AS or MS. Furthermore, in contrast to patients with rheumatic MS, those with degenerative MS have no commissural fusion and are thus not good candidates for percutaneous mitral commissurotomy. Hence, valve replacement is generally the sole option currently available for the treatment of severe symptomatic severe AS or MS. Previous studies suggest that AS is an actively regulated process that involves several pathways including lipid infiltration, retention and oxidation, inflammation, and fibrocalcific remodelling of the aortic valve.3 Although data from animal models, Mendelian randomization, and retrospective studies3,4 suggest that LDL-cholesterol could be an important initiator of AS, three randomized clinical trials (SALTIRE, SEAS, ASTRONOMER)5–7 failed to demonstrate any significant benefit of aggressive LDL-cholesterol-lowering therapy with statins and/or fibrates in patients with mild to moderate AS. On the other hand, recent studies reported that genetic variation in the LPA locus, mediated by Lp(a) levels, is associated with higher incidence of aortic sclerosis and AS in the general population.4,8,9 In a substudy of ASTRONOMER, Capoulade et al.10 also reported that elevated plasma level of Lp(a) is a powerful independent predictor of faster AS progression, particularly in the younger patients. In contrast to AS, there is relatively few published data on the pathophysiology of degenerative MS. In the present study, Hojo et al.1 found that Lp(a) is associated not only with AS but also with MS. These findings would suggest that degenerative MS shares with AS some common causative factors, including Lp(a). However, the study of Hojo et al.1 has some significant limitations including (i) the cross-sectional and retrospective nature of the study, which precludes the demonstration of a cause–effect relationship between Lp(a) and stenotic valvular lesions; and (ii) the very small number (n = 11) of patients with MS, which considerably limits the statistical power and thus the robustness of the multivariable analysis for MS. In the large study by Thanassoulis et al.,4 genetic variations in the LPA locus was not associated with mitral annulus calcification. However, this previous study did not examine the association with MS. Despite its inherent limitations, the study of Hojo et al.1 provides further support to the concept that Lp(a) is a factor associated with the development of AS and, in addition, it raises the hypothesis that Lp(a) may also be involved in the pathogenesis of degenerative MS. About 20% of the general population have elevated Lp(a), and there is now a large body of evidence in experimental and clinical studies supporting the role of Lp(a) in the development of coronary artery disease, PAD, and VHD.11 Among lipoproteins, Lp(a) is the main carrier of oxidized phospholipids (OxPL) in the bloodstream. When OxPL accumulate in the vascular or valvular tissues, they are recognized by the immune system as danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). The response of the immune system in trying to clear DAMPs is to generate inflammation, which then mediates atherogenicity. Furthermore, OxPL are transformed into lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) by the lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) enzyme. In turn, LPC provides a substrate for the autotaxin enzyme, which produces lysophosphatidic acid (LPA).12 Both LPC and LPA have been shown to promote the osteogenic differentiation and calcification of vascular and valvular cells. Hence, Lp(a) and associated OxPL could, through their pro-inflammatory, pro-atherogenic, and pro-calcifying properties, contribute to the development of both PAD and degenerative stenotic valvular lesions. On the other hand, these factors likely have little role in the pathogenesis of regurgitant valvular lesions, which involve more myxomatous degeneration rather than calcific degeneration. These findings may explain, at least in part, why in the study of Hojo et al.1 Lp(a) was associated with AS and MS but not with AR, MR, or TR. When analysed collectively, the findings reported in the literature, including the present study,1,4,8–10,13 support a role for Lp(a)/OxPL/LPC/LPA pathway in the development and progression of AS and thus provide an impetus for the realization of a randomized clinical trial of Lp(a)-lowering therapy in this population. However, the Lp(a) circulating levels are, in large part, determined genetically, and currently available drugs such as niacin only achieve minimal reduction in Lp(a) and have several important side effects. Recently, antisense oligonucleotide directed to Apolipoprotein A has been developed and has been shown to reduce Lp(a) levels by >80% with minimal side effects.14 PCSK9 inhibitors may also reduce Lp(a) by 20–30%. The next step is to test the efficacy of these new drugs to slow the progression of AS. The study of Hojo et al.1 provides further arguments to implement systematic screening of Lp(a) in patients with PAD and/or VHD and to undertake randomized trials to assess the effect of Lp(a)-lowering therapy in patients with AS. This study also suggests that Lp(a) may also be involved in the development of degenerative MS, but further studies in larger series of patients are necessary to confirm this hypothesis and eventually consider a Lp(a)-lowering trial targeting this population. Conflict of interest: P.P. received research grant from Ionis Pharmaceuticals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.012 | 0.013 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".