MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2310694395 · doi:10.1137/16m1066890

Eulerian Methods for Visualizing Continuous Dynamical Systems using Lyapunov Exponents

2017· article· en· W2310694395 on OpenAlexaff
Guoqiao You, Tony Wong, Shingyu Leung

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Scientific Computing · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum chaos and dynamical systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersResearch Grants Council, University Grants Committee
KeywordsLyapunov exponentIsosurfaceMathematicsFlow (mathematics)Eulerian pathApplied mathematicsComputationDynamical systems theoryPartial differential equationMathematical analysisAlgorithmComputer scienceVisualizationGeometryArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a new Eulerian numerical approach for constructing forward flow maps in continuous dynamical systems. The new algorithm improves the original formulation developed in [S. Leung, J. Comput. Phys., 230 (2011), pp. 3500--3524; S. Leung, Chaos, 23 (2013), 043132] so that the associated PDEs are solved forward in time and, therefore, the forward flow map can now be determined on the fly. Thanks to the simplicity of the implementations, we are now able to efficiently compute the unstable coherent structures in the flow based on quantities like the finite time Lyapunov exponent (FTLE), the finite size Lyapunov exponent (FSLE) and also a related infinitesimal size Lyapunov exponent (ISLE). When applied to the ISLE computations, the Eulerian method is particularly computationally efficient. For each separation factor $r$ in the definition of the ISLE, typical Lagrangian methods are required to shoot and monitor an individual set of ray trajectories. If the scale factor in the definition changes, these methods have to begin the computations all over again. The proposed Eulerian method, however, needs to extract only an isosurface of volumetric data for an individual value of $r$, which can be easily done using any well-developed efficient interpolation method or simply an isosurface extraction algorithm. Moreover, we provide a theoretical link between the FTLE and ISLE fields, which explains the similarity in these solutions observed in various applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSIAM Journal on Scientific ComputingSame topicQuantum chaos and dynamical systemsFrench-language works237,207