MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2310849129 · doi:10.2138/rmg.2016.81.12

Highly Siderophile and Strongly Chalcophile Elements in Magmatic Ore Deposits

2015· article· en· W2310849129 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueReviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetal Extraction and Bioleaching
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitationDownloadGeologyArchaeologyHistoryGeochemistryLibrary scienceWorld Wide WebComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| January 01, 2016 Highly Siderophile and Strongly Chalcophile Elements in Magmatic Ore Deposits Sarah-Jane Barnes; Sarah-Jane Barnes Sciences de la Terre, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi, Québec, G7H 2B1, Canada, sjbarnes@uqac.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Edward M. Ripley Edward M. Ripley Department of Geological Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington Indiana, 47405, USA, ripley@indiana.edu Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Sarah-Jane Barnes Sciences de la Terre, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi, Québec, G7H 2B1, Canada, sjbarnes@uqac.ca Edward M. Ripley Department of Geological Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington Indiana, 47405, USA, ripley@indiana.edu Publisher: Mineralogical Society of America First Online: 09 Mar 2017 © 2016 Mineralogical Society of America Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry (2016) 81 (1): 725–774. https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2016.81.12 Article history First Online: 09 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation Sarah-Jane Barnes, Edward M. Ripley; Highly Siderophile and Strongly Chalcophile Elements in Magmatic Ore Deposits. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry 2016;; 81 (1): 725–774. doi: https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2016.81.12 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyReviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry Search Advanced Search An ore deposit by definition must be economically viable, that is to say it must contain sufficient material at high enough grade to make it possible to mine and process it at a profit (Bates and Jackson 1987). This requires the elements to be collected and concentrated by some phase and for them to be deposited close to the surface of the earth. At the oxygen fugacities found in the crust, native Fe is not normally stable and thus the highly siderophile elements (defined as Ru, Rh, Pd, Re, Os, Ir, Pt, and Au) cannot behave as siderophile... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.540
Threshold uncertainty score0.465

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it