MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2310919266 · doi:10.5539/cis.v9n2p23

High Quality - Low Computational Cost Technique for Automated Principal Object Segmentation Applied in Solar and Medical Imaging

2016· article· en· W2310919266 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sofyan Hayajneh, AbdulRahman Rashad, Omar A. Saraereh, Obaida M. Al-Hazaimeh

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer and Information Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePreprocessorComputer visionProcess (computing)Image processingSegmentationNoise (video)Filter (signal processing)Pattern recognition (psychology)Image (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this paper is to introduce a fully computerized, simple and low-computational cost technique that can be used in the preprocessing stages of digital images. This technique is specially designed to detect the principal (largest) closed shape object that embody the useful information in certain image types and neglect and avoid other noisy objects and artifacts. The detection process starts by calculating certain statistics of the image to estimate the amount of bit-plane slicing required to exclude the non-informative and noisy background. A simple closing morphological operation is then applied and followed by circular filter applied only on the outer coarse edge to finalize the detection process. The proposed technique takes its importance from the huge explosion of images that need accurate processing in real time speedy manner. The proposed technique is implemented using MATLAB and tested on many solar and medical images; it was shown by the quantitative evaluation that the proposed technique can handle real-life (e.g. solar, medical fundus) images and shows very good potential even under noisy and artifacts conditions. Compared to the publicly available datasets, 97% and 99% of similarity detection is achieved in medical and solar images, respectively. Although it is well-know, the morphological bit-plane slicing technique is hoped to be used in the preprocessing stages of different applications to ease the subsequent image processing stages especially in real time applications where the proposed technique showed dramatic (~100 times) saving in processing time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputer and Information ScienceSame topicRetinal Imaging and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207