Angiographic and Intracoronary Manifestations of Coronary Fibromuscular Dysplasia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We previously described a strong association between fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) and spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Angiographic manifestations of coronary FMD aside from dissection were considered rare. However, we observed several coronary FMD angiographic abnormalities with corresponding optical coherence tomography abnormalities. METHODS AND RESULTS: Baseline demographics and imaging of patients with suspected coronary FMD at Vancouver General Hospital were reviewed. Presence of multifocal (string-of-beads) extracoronary FMD was confirmed by 2 specialists. In these patients, coronary angiographic findings (excluding dissected segments) were reviewed and classified by 2 experienced angiographers for irregular stenosis, that is, stenosis with irregular borders in a focal or diffuse pattern with/without systolic accentuation; smooth stenosis, diffuse or focal; segmental dilatation/ectasia; and tortuosity. Optical coherence tomography was performed in a subset of patients. Of 32 patients with extracoronary FMD and suspected coronary involvement, 28 were women (88%), and their mean age was 59.4±9.9 years. Nineteen presented with myocardial infarction (13 caused by spontaneous coronary artery dissection), and 13 had stable symptoms. The observed coronary angiographic abnormalities included tortuosity in all cases (91% were moderate to severe), irregular stenosis in 59%, smooth stenosis in 19%, and segmental dilatation/ectasia in 56%. Fifteen patients had optical coherence tomography of the abnormal segments showing abnormalities, including multiple areas of patchy or diffuse intimal, medial or adventitial abnormalities with thickening/accumulation of varied reflectivities, macrophage infiltration, loss/duplication of elastic membranes, and cavitation. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first case series describing findings suggestive of angiographic and intracoronary manifestations of coronary FMD. Future studies should prospectively review these features in patients with extracoronary FMD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".