MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2311768516 · doi:10.14796/jwmm.r225-10

Optimization of Enhanced Coagulation in Water Treatment using Bayesian Networks

2006· article· en· W2311768516 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Zoe Jingyu Zhu, Edward A. McBean, Hongde Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Water Management Modeling · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Treatment and Disinfection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoagulationBayesian probabilityComputer scienceBiochemical engineeringMedicineArtificial intelligenceEngineeringInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a result of the potential health effects of disinfection byproducts, there is extensive interest in alternative treatment technologies which lessen their formation. The potential for enhanced coagulation to improve the removal efficiency of organic matter and thus decrease the formation of disinfection byproducts is identified. A Bayesian Network model is used to simulate different coagulation conditions for purposes of determining optimal conditions for enhanced coagulation. The causal dependence relationships amongst the variables (e.g. coagulant, pH, temperature, etc.) are encoded in a Bayesian network structure to identify the most advantageous configuration of treatment options.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.448
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Water Management ModelingSame topicWater Treatment and DisinfectionFrench-language works237,207