MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2311854124 · doi:10.1109/tste.2015.2504504

An Enhanced MPPT Method Combining Model-Based and Heuristic Techniques

2015· article· en· W2311854124 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicPhotovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaximum power point trackingHeuristicComputer scienceBitTorrent trackerPhotovoltaic systemPower (physics)Point (geometry)Computational complexity theoryVoltageSet (abstract data type)Control theory (sociology)AlgorithmEngineeringMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An MPPT approach combining model-based and heuristic techniques has recently appeared in the literature for accelerating the tracking speed of the maximum power point (MPP) of PV systems. Despite the improved tracking speed, it requires an accurate temperature measurement that increases the cost and complexity of the implementation in comparison to the nonmodel-based maximum power point trackers (MPPTs). This paper proposes an MPPT method, which eliminates the need for temperature measurement. The proposed approach relies on a new set of equations capable of estimating the PV module temperature through utilizing the current and voltage measurements. It combines the well-known heuristic P&O and model-based techniques to ensure an accurate and high speed tracking. The proposed method also uniquely adopts a recently developed simple nontranscendental PV model featuring reduced computational time to reduce the computational complexity of the implementation. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is verified using real-time simulation and experimentally.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it