MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2311888033

A MILP model for joint product family and supply chain design

2011· preprint· en· W2311888033 on OpenAlexaff
Bertrand Baud-Lavigne, Bruno Agard, Bernard Penz

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2011
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicProduct Development and Customization
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupply chainSubstitution (logic)Computer scienceProduct (mathematics)Joint (building)Mathematical optimizationProduct designComponent (thermodynamics)Linear programmingInteger programmingChain (unit)MathematicsEngineeringBusinessAlgorithm
DOInot available

Abstract

International audience

Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.

How this classification was reachedexpand

The three-model screen

all 5,600 screened works →

All three models called this out of scope.

stratum: aff_core · design weight: 5595.24 (the sample is stratified; any rate computed without the weight is wrong)
Claude Opus 4.8OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

MILP optimization model for joint product family and supply chain design; operations research on a design problem, not on research.

GPT-5.6 (high)OUT
genre: conceptual
about Canada: no
confidence: high

The work proposes a supply-chain design model and does not study research itself.

Grok 4.5OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: medium

Title is joint product-family and supply-chain optimization; domain operations research with thin abstract.

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)Same topicProduct Development and CustomizationFrench-language works237,207