MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2312194293 · doi:10.1149/1.3700408

XANES and XEOL Investigation of Cerium and Terbium Co-Doped Silicon Oxide Films

2012· article· en· W2312194293 on OpenAlexafffund
Patrick R. Wilson, Zahra Khatami, Ryszard Dabkowski, Kayne Dunn, Evgueni Chelomentsev, J. Wójcik, Peter Mascher

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersOntario Centres of Excellence
KeywordsTerbiumMaterials scienceCeriumPhotoluminescenceLuminescenceXANESAnalytical Chemistry (journal)DopingSilicon oxideSiliconAbsorption edgeAmorphous solidSpectroscopyChemistryCrystallographyOptoelectronicsSilicon nitrideBand gapMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The luminescent and structural properties of cerium and terbium co-doped silicon oxide thin films were investigated through transmission electron microscopy, photoluminescence spectroscopy, and synchrotron-based X-ray absorption spectroscopy. While combined blue and green luminescence characteristic of Ce3+ and Tb3+ ions, respectively, was observed from different compositions of films, the emission intensity from samples in which Ce2Si2O7 nanocrystallites were formed after high temperature annealing was much stronger than in films where the Ce and Tb co-dopants were incorporated in an amorphous SiO2 host matrix. Films containing the cerium silicate phase also exhibited a very strong enhancement of Tb emission. X-ray absorption near edge structure and X-ray excited optical luminescence analysis at the Si L3,2-, Si K-, O K-, Ce N4-, and Ce M5,4-edges indicated this enhancement was likely the result of a direct energy transfer process between the cerium silicate and Tb levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207