pyACDT: An Object-Oriented Framework for Aircraft Design Modelling and Multidisciplinary Optimization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present pyACDT, an object-oriented design framework that facilitates the definition, analysis, and optimization of aircraft concepts. Based on a strong emphasis on object-oriented development, the proposed implementation provides a flexible, efficient and portable architecture where concepts can be rapidly modelled, analyzed on multiple levels of fidelity, and optimized on a monolithic or multi-disciplinary fashion. The architecture top layer is is programmed in Python which allows for the bottom layers a seamless interfacing with codes developed in other programming languages such as C, C++, and Fortran. In this paper we described the development criteria and implementation of pyACDT to provide an scalable, extensible, and reusable framework. This allow designers to focus on the design aspects and the optimization of the aircraft concept they are developing, rather than on the implementation and integration details to accomplished such task.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it