VIEWS and NEWS <br> 6th annual International Biomass Conference & Expo • 12th International Wheat Genetics Symposium • Antibodypedia • CNIO and Nature joint events •The first use of anti-cancer engineered T cell therapy in children • The scientific world criticizes the study by Gilles-Eric Séralini et al. concerning health risks arising from genetically modified maize • Whole genome sequencing of circulating DNA in cancer patients.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The 6 th International Biomass Conference & Expo will be held on 8-10 April 2013, in Minneapolis (Minnesota, USA).This annual event brings together researchers, technology developers and industry professionals from all sectors of the world's biomass utilization industry, and the bio-based power, thermal energy, fuel and chemical industries.The conference is organized by BBI International (a company organizing bioenergy events and publishing trade magazines) and supported by Biomass Magazine.This event provides networking opportunities for suppliers of bioenergy and bio-based products, farmers growing energy crops, municipal leaders, technology providers, equipment manufacturers, project developers, investors and policy makers.The International Biomass Conference & Expo is the largest, and fastest-growing event of its kind.In 2013, nearly 1600 participants are expected to attend the Conference.In 2012, the event attracted nearly 1500 attendees and doubled the attendance of the inaugural show.The 2013 International Biomass Conference & Expo program will include over 30 panels and more than 100 speakers, including 90 technical presentations on topics ranging from anaerobic digestion and gasification to pyrolysis and combined heat and power, all within the framework of five customized tracks: Pellets & Densified Biomass; Industrial & Commercial Thermal Energy; Biomass Power; Biogas & Landfill Gas; and Advanced Biofuels & Bio-based Chemicals.More information about the conference can be accessed at www.biomassconference.com.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.151 | 0.091 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".