MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2312222902 · doi:10.4043/26080-ms

The Thermal Recovery Methods and Technical Limits of Bohai Offshore Heavy Oil Reservoirs: A Case Study

2015· article· en· W2312222902 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOTC Brasil · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Science and Technology Major ProjectNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSubmarine pipelinePetroleum engineeringOffshore geotechnical engineeringPetroleumOil productionGeologyEnvironmental scienceGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heavy oil accounts for a large proportion in offshore petroleum reserves. For Bohai offshore oilfield in China, about 85% of the OOIP is the heavy oil. Heavy oil has become an important form to guarantee the offshore oil production. Considering the limited space in offshore oil platform, cold production method is the commonly-used development method. But for some heavy oils with higher viscosity (>350cp), cold production method is less effective, and thermal recovery process will be a better choice. In this paper, we focuses on three different heavy oil reservoirs from Bohai offshore oilfield, including the blocks of NB35-2, LD-1 and LD-2. These three blocks essentially represents the main heavy oil reservoir types of Bohai oilfield (edge-water, bottom-water and thick oillayer). Then through the analogical analysis between onshore reservoirs and offshore reservoirs, the development methods for the three blocks are determined firstly. In this process, we make a survey on the development status of onshore heavy oil reservoirs in China. Then, based on the geological properties of the three blocks, a set of numerical simulation runs are performed to analyze the influence of many sensitive factors (e.g., reservoir depth, thickness, permeability, net-to-gross and water-zone). After that, through the computation of net present value (NPV), we reevaluate the economic limit indexes of thermal recovery process in Bohai offshore heavy oil reservoirs and determine the technical limits. From the analogical results, it is concluded that different heavy oil reservoir will have different thermal recovery method. For the three heavy oil reservoirs, cyclic steam stimulation (CSS) process is a potential EOR method for block LD-1, and steam flooding is a better choice for NB35-2, and LD-2 could adopt the methods of steam flooding process and SAGD process. From the numerical simulation results and NPV results, we found it is not economical to perform a CSS process in LD-1. For the other two blocks, NB35-2 and LD-2, the economical cumulative oil-steam ratios under the corresponding thermal recovery methods are calculated. And the technical limit of thermal recovery process in Bohai offshore heavy oil reservoirs are derived. It shows that a steam flooding process is suitable to the edge-water heavy oil reservoirs in Bohai oilfield whose heterogeneity is relatively weak, formation is relatively thin (10m<thickness <25 m), and water zone energy is low (water/oil ratio<5). And a steam flooding process is suitable to the heavy oil reservoirs in Bohai oilfield whose thickness is higher than 30m, net-to-gross is greater than 0.55, and reservoir depth is less than 1400 m. This work is useful to extend the thermal recovery process in Bohai offshore heavy oil reservoirs. It will play an important role for the effective development of offshore heavy oil reservoirs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.884
Threshold uncertainty score0.597

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it