MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2312262749

Invasive Plants: Their Impacts and Control in Changing Environments

2004· article· en· W2312262749 on OpenAlexaffabout
Judith H. Myers, Madlen Denoth, Jacqueline Shaben

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInvasive speciesIntroduced speciesNative plantThreatened speciesBiologyEcologyHabitatBiodiversityPlant communityRare speciesRangelandAgroforestrySpecies richness
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While it is frequently stated that invasive species are second only to habitat destruction as a cause of species extinctions, this generalization does not apply to plants. In this paper, we briefly discuss three issues concerning the impacts of exotic plants: the impact of an introduced plant species on a rare native plant species, the potential long-term impacts of exotics on plant communities, and the possible interactions between biological control success and climate change. Purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria), is a European plant species that is now widespread in wetland areas of northern North America. We predicted that the invasion of purple loosestrife might reduce the density of a rare plant species, Henderson's checker-mallow (Sidalcea hendersonii), in a tidal marsh habitat in British Columbia; however, this was not the case. Thus, just because a new species becomes common does not mean it will threaten rare native species. Predicting species interactions is difficult. Introduced plants, however, can have long-term impacts on plant communities. For example, legumes can change soil nitrogen, and through soil enrichment, can create long-term changes to invaded communities. Plants that efficiently use soil moisture can also prevent the reestablishment of native species and can reduce biodiversity. In these situations, the invasive plants act as ecological engineers. We discuss two examples of this: the invasion of threatened Garry oak (Quercus garryana) meadows by Scotch broom (Cytisus scoparius) and the persistence of crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum ssp. pectinatum) in dry rangelands. In these situations, the invasive plants could possibly act as ecological engineers. Models of climate change predict increased drought in some regions of Canada. Between 2001 and 2003, rainfall in the Okanagan Valley was well below normal levels, although similar drought conditions have occurred in the recent past. Over this same time period, an invasive rangeland weed, diffuse knapweed (Centaurea diffusa), declined dramatically in density following high levels of attack by a recently introduced biological control agent, a weevil, Larinus minutus. Rainfall and knapweed density are related, and the feeding damage by this weevil likely increased the drought stress of knapweed plants and may have contributed to their demise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies→French-language works237,207→