MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2312299082 · doi:10.1139/cgj-2015-0415

Experimental study on water evaporation from compacted clay using environmental chamber

2016· article· en· W2312299082 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Weikang Song, Yu-Jun Cui, Anh Minh Tang, Wenqi Ding, Qiong Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEvaporationDesiccationEnvironmental chamberSuctionWater contentRelative humiditySoil waterHumidityGeotechnical engineeringEnvironmental scienceSoil scienceMaterials scienceVolume (thermodynamics)Water vaporGeologyChemistryMeteorologyEcologyThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Water evaporation induces large volume change for clayey soils, often causing problems to geotechnical and geoenvironmental constructions. To better understand this process, an evaporation test on a compacted clay was conducted in a large-scale environmental chamber under controlled atmospheric conditions. Atmospheric parameters (wind speed, air temperature, and relative humidity) and the response of soil parameters (volumetric water content, temperature, soil suction as well as desiccation cracks) were monitored. The results show that the soil temperature is strongly related to the air conditions, evaporation process, and desiccation cracks. Unlike for sand, the evolution of volumetric water content is governed by both the high water retention capacity of clay and the effect of cracks. A three-stage evolution can be observed for not only the actual evaporation rate, but also the surface crack ratio. Thus, the surface crack ratio can be considered as one important parameter in the evaporation analysis taking into account the effect of desiccation cracks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.206
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicSoil and Unsaturated FlowFrench-language works237,207